tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post6963420885704386259..comments2023-05-22T10:42:54.046-04:00Comments on 6th or 7th: Math with the details blurred outEthanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07498712279382078624noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post-64793288386299241922010-01-24T13:53:16.665-05:002010-01-24T13:53:16.665-05:00Ahh, thank goodness. My cynicism remains unsoiled....Ahh, thank goodness. My cynicism remains unsoiled.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13816176831445292026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post-76006598085064575032010-01-24T13:43:25.704-05:002010-01-24T13:43:25.704-05:00Thanks for the congratulations!
I should point ou...Thanks for the congratulations!<br /><br />I should point out, though, that it's not 60:1, because he makes close to my hourly wage every minute of his life, where I only make it every hour I'm working. I'll get that amount forty times every week, whereas he'll get it almost ten thousand times a week. The real ratio is somewhere between 200:1 and 250:1.Ethanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07498712279382078624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post-77961779992463498092010-01-24T13:26:25.090-05:002010-01-24T13:26:25.090-05:0060:1 is actually pretty modest in terms of income ...60:1 is actually pretty modest in terms of income inequality - I vaguely remember a Michael Moore book where he quotes that the major corporations, from the top of the pay scale to the bottom, have something like a 350:1 ratio. 60:1 is closer to the LAST Gilded Age. Congratulations on the new job.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13816176831445292026noreply@blogger.com