tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post6092555710891746495..comments2023-05-22T10:42:54.046-04:00Comments on 6th or 7th: Apparently it actually has something to do with UPSEthanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07498712279382078624noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post-2209160399141584392010-05-25T21:43:38.304-04:002010-05-25T21:43:38.304-04:00Ah, so it's the corporate version of men's...Ah, so it's the corporate version of men's rights activism.<br /><br />I mostly thought it was some hilarious racism at first.Ethanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07498712279382078624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8981856246989013843.post-68134367579793280662010-05-25T14:59:45.777-04:002010-05-25T14:59:45.777-04:00This is FedEx's term for a legal change that w...This is FedEx's term for a legal change that would put them under the same regulatory classification as most shipping companies, thus exposing them equally to unionization. <br /><br />Right now FedEx falls under some exclusion originally meant for the railway industry that made it harder to form unions.<br /><br />FedEx has rather humorously attempted to portray the change as a "bailout" for UPS in the sense that FedEx would now be held to the same regulatory standard, whereas previously it held an advantage.JRBhttp://ladypoverty.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com